Davis v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court o£ the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern District of California; Oscar A. Trippet, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against Robert Davis and O. A. Dodson. Judgment of conviction, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.,
The plaintiffs in error were convicted under an indictment which charged them with conspiring to commit the offense of knowingly, willfully, and unlawfully transporting, selling, bartering, furnishing, and possessing intoxicating liquor, namely, whis-ky, in violation of the National Prohibition Act of October 28, 1918 (41 Stat. 305). The indictment set forth overt acts, among which it was charged that on a date named, the plaintiffs in error did knowingly, willfully, and unlawfully advise, counsel, and abet Adolpho C. Olivas to knowingly, willfully, and unlawfully…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shelp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
- Hockett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
3Cited by17 opinions
- Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- Feinberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Hensberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Carnahan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.