Legal Opinion
Hensberg v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 9, 1923No. 6133PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, District Judge.
Plaintiff in error was convicted in the court below of violating, the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305). The information contained two counts, one based upon unlawful sale, the other upon unlawful possession. As the sentence imposed was imprisonment, and as the record does not disclose any prior offense, it is apparent that the sentence was imposed on the sale count *371only. That count is therefore the only one that needs to be considered here. - »
The errors relied upon are five in number and raise two main questions: One as to the sufficiency of the information; the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Prohibition CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Jacob Ruppert v. CaffeySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- Goldberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Strada v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Myers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Furlong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- McCarren v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1925
- Weinstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.