Hockett v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Arizona; William H. Sawtelle, Judge. Bart E. Hockett and others were convicted of conspiracy to violate the Reed Amendment, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN FLEET, District Judge.
The in who, as in the court below, may be designated as defendants,’ were, jointly with others, indicted under section 37, P. C. (Comp. St. § 10201), for a conspiracy to violate the act known as the Reed Amendment (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, §§• 8739a, 10387a-10387c). De*589fendants were convicted and sentenced to imprisonment, and seek a review of the judgment.
[1] Besides a challenge to the sufficiency of the indictment, raised by a demurrer, which was overruled, defendants urge upon our attention several assignments of error in the instructions of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Dealy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Shelp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
- Lewis v. Erie R.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rudner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- United States v. DowlingDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1922
- Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- Carnahan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.