Legal Opinion

Carnahan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1929No. 8393PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Carnahan, and others,. were indicted for conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA). Carnahan and one De Mayo separately- appealed. De Mayo has dismissed his appeal. This is the appeal of Carnahan. The claimed errors argued here involve the sufficiency of the indictment; the. sufficiency of the evidence; the admission of evidence; the charge as given and refusal of requests to charge.

I. The indictment was in three counts. The government elected, at the beginning of the trial, to proceed on the first count. That count charged a conspiracy to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. McKelvey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  4. Lambert v. YellowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Donnelley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Nicoli v. BriggsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. A. Ray Segal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  4. Hilliard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  5. Great American Insurance Company v. Sam HorabCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API