State v. Morgan
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Chief Justice.
Defendant was found guilty upon an indictment for Conspiracy to Possess Cocaine with Intent to Sell or Deliver, N.C.G.S. § 90-98 (1990). A unanimous panel of the Court of Appeals reversed, holding that there was no evidence in the record of defendant’s intent to deliver or sell. We reverse, holding that such intent may be inferred from evidence of the quantity of the controlled substance involved in this case. Addressing another issue preserved by defendant’s appeal but not addressed by the Court of Appeals, we conclude there was no error in the admission at trial of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. CottonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. CreasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. WinklerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. ShellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. Euceda-ValleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.