Cidale v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge:
Ricardo and Leslie Cidale appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the United States on their claim to recover income taxes erroneously assessed. The issue in this appeal is whether a taxable transfer occurred on the date the taxpayers’ non-statutory employee stock options were exercised, when they financed the purchase with margin debt, or on the date the shares were sold. Relying on the district court’s analysis and a growing body of caselaw, we hold that the exercise date is controlling and thus AFFIRM.
I. BACKGROUND
On January 31, 2000, Cidale…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mayo v. Hartford Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. James H. TuffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Palahnuk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kornman & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Palahnuk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Racine v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Kornman & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Racine, Robert C. v. CIRCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007