Racine v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.
Non-cash compensation, such as shares of stock, is taxable when the “transfer” to the recipient occurs. 26 U.S.C. § 83. According to a Treasury Regulation, 26 C.F.R. § 1.83-3(a)(2), the grant of an option to purchase stock (or other property) is not itself a transfer, which does not occur until the option is exercised. This case presents the question whether the “transfer” may be postponed even after the option’s exercise, on the theory that borrowing to finance the transaction amounts to a second option that replaces the first.
Gail Racine held options to purchase…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. James H. TuffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Palahnuk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Cidale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Racine v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
3Cited by3 opinions
- Veleron Holding, B.V. v. StanleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- United States v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Michael FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009