Legal Opinion

United States v. James H. Tuff

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 4, 2006No. 05-35195PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.

James H. Tuff (“Tuff’) appeals the summary judgment granted the United States in its action to recover $208,513.20 refunded to Tuff by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in connection with stock options Tuff exercised in 1999 through a margin loan from Morgan Stanley. We affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

The appeal turns on whether Tuff received income in the form of shares of stock when he exercised his options, or when Morgan Stanley liquidated the shares after their value had declined.

The material facts are not in dispute. Tuff was employed by RealNetworks, Inc., at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richard A. Cramer Alice D. Cramer Warren K. Boynton Susi M. Boynton Kevin P. Monaghan Dina A. Monaghan v. Commissioner, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Antonio Lopez-PereraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Palahnuk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Merlo v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. Strom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Allen v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  4. Palahnuk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. Cidale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API