Legal Opinion

Hinckley v. La Mesa R. v. Center, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 13, 1984No. Civ. 24543PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STANIFORTH, Acting P. J.

Robert F. Hinkley’s and Dorothy Hayes’ complaint for damages against La Mesa R. V. Center (La Mesa), Surveyor Industries, Inc. (Surveyor), and Chrysler Corporation (Chrysler), 1 charged negligence, strict liability and breach of warranty. At the end of plaintiffs’ case, the trial court entered judgment of nonsuit against them in favor of La Mesa and Surveyor. The court ruled there was no credible evidence to support a recovery on any of the plaintiffs’ theories. Hinckley and Hayes appeal, contending they presented sufficient evidence to support a jury verdict in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. James Blasius v. Angel Automotive Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Westside Center Associates v. Safeway Stores 23, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Staples v. HoefkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Silvio v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Karen Pavoni v. Chrysler GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API