Legal Opinion

Bertinelli v. Galoni

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1938No. Appeal, 158PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer,

This appeal by defendant in an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff, twenty-six-months’ old when they were received, presents an unusual situation. Although the child’s parents are alive and the child lives with them, the suit is brought in her behalf by her grandmother as next friend. This somewhat strange proceeding is for the obvious purpose of recovering damages from the insurance company which indemnified the father against liability for personal injuries resulting from the negligent operation of the automobile…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Renschler v. PizanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Goodall v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Griffith v. v. A. Simrell & Son Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Haines v. FitzgeraldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Heft & Hix v. McGillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. McSparran v. WeistCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. HaagSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PaynterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. Youngblood v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  5. Strickland Ex Rel. Steed v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API