Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Haag
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 24, 2002No. 84183501PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice NEWMAN.
Naomi Haag (Appellant), as next friend of Randy Todd Haag (Haag), appeals from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County (PCRA court) denying her motion to stay all Post Conviction Relief Act1 (PCRA) proceedings and requiring her to proceed on the PCRA petition that she had filed on behalf of Haag. Based upon the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
*295I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case involves a somewhat complicated procedural history. On February 7, 1986, a jury found Haag guilty of the first-degree murder and kidnapping of Richard Good. Following a…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.