Legal Opinion
State v. Ferraro
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided October 30, 1990No. 14026; CR. NOS. 88-007K; 88-102K & 87-408PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
HEEN, J.
In these consolidated cases, Criminal No. 88-007K (No. 88-007K) and Criminal No. 88-102K (No. 88-102K), Defendant Joseph Thomas Ferraro (Defendant) appeals his jury trial conviction for the offenses of Forgery in the Second Degree, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 708-852 (Supp. 1989) in Count XVI of No. 88-007K; Theft in the Second Degree, HRS § 708-831 (Supp. 1989), Theft in the Fourth Degree, HRS § 708-833 (Supp. 1989), and Attempted Theft in the Second Degree, HRS § 705-500 (1985) and § 708-831, in Counts IV, VI, and IX, respectively, in No. 88-102K. A…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Tedlock v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. Lee IkezawaHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. LauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.