Legal Opinion
Chase v. Columbia National Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 9, 1993No. 91 Civ. 3357 (RWS)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sylvia Chase (“Chase”) has moved for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., dismissing the First through Sixth counterclaims of Defendant Columbia National Corporation (“Columbia”), now known as Columbia National Group, Inc., on the ground they are barred by a contractual provision agreed upon by the parties. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.
The Parties
The Plaintiff is a resident of the State of New York and the widow and executrix of the estate of Myron Chase (the “Chase Estate”). The Witte Chase Corporation…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Rusyniak v. GensiniDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Dornberger v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Petedge, Inc. v. GargDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- DynCorp v. GTE Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- DealTime.com Ltd. v. McNultyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.