Legal Opinion
Rusyniak v. Gensini
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided May 5, 2009No. 8:07-cr-00279PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
GLENN T. SUDDABY, District Judge.
Walter Rusyniak and Anthony Rusyniak (“Plaintiffs”) commenced this action against Ena Paola Gensini, Gunila De Montaigu, and Concha Futura, S.A. (“Defendants”), asserting claims of (1) fraud, (2) breach of fiduciary duty, (3) civil conspiracy, (4) breach of contract, and (5) violation of Panamanian corporate law. (Dkt. No. 16, at 9-17 [Plf.’s Am. Compl.].)
Currently before the Court are Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, and Plaintiffs’ cross-motion to amend their Amended Complaint. (Dkt. Nos. 24, 41.) Plaintiffs seek…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Praileau v. FischerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Carris v. First Student, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2015
- Thomas v. City of TroyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2018
- Trombley v. O'NeillDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Terrill v. Windham-Ashland-Jewett Central School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2016
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.