Commonwealth v. Raybuck
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
McCAFFERY, J.
¶'1 The Commonwealth appeals from the trial court order denying its motion for reconsideration of the sentence imposed on Appellee, Cheryl M. Raybuck, following her conviction for two counts of aggravated assault. Specifically, the Commonwealth asks us to determine whether the trial court erred by not applying the deadly weapons enhancement1 to Appellee’s sentence based on Appellee’s use of commercial mouse poison and household chemicals to commit her offenses. We conclude that commercial mouse poison is a deadly weapon for purposes of the enhancement rule in this case;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FullinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. SaranchakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. ScullinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. CornishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. MagnumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ButerbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. RhoadesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. BrougherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. FaulkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. KnellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.