Commonwealth v. Buterbaugh
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
PANELLA, J.
Appellant, Gerald Travis Buterbaugh, appeals from the judgment of sentence arising from a conviction of third-degree murder.1 We granted en banc review to determine, among other things, whether an automobile constitutes a deadly weapon for purposes of the deadly weapon sentence enhancement. See 204 Pa. Code §§ 303.10(a), 303.17b. Because we conclude that it does, and that Appellant’s remaining issues do not merit relief, we affirm.
The trial court set forth the relevant facts and procedural history as follows.
This case concerns the murder of Dale Steven Henry, whom…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Commonwealth v. MourySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. WallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by392 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ZirkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. TejadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Com. v. Chichkin, I.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Commonwealth v. StilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- In the Interest of: J.G., a MinorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
387 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.