Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cornish

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1991No. 01201 Philadelphia 1990PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

This Commonwealth appeal is from the judgment of sentence imposed after appellee pled guilty to robbery, possessing an instrument of crime, unlawful use of a computer, and attempted theft by deception. The Commonwealth contends that the sentencing court erred in failing to apply the deadly weapon enhancement provision of the sentencing guidelines 1 when it determined the guideline ranges applicable to appellee’s robbery conviction. For the reasons set forth below, we vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for resentencing.

On November 18, 1989, appellee went to the victim’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DeversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. SessomsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Ballou v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ButerbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. RhoadesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. PeerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. ScullinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API