Commonwealth v. Magnum
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
The Commonwealth appeals and James Magnum cross-appeals a judgment of sentence imposed upon Magnum for committing the following crimes: burglary, 1 making terroristic threats, 2 criminal trespass, 3 possessing an instrument of crime, 4 unlawful restraint, 5 and simple assault. 6 The Commonwealth claims that the trial court, when imposing sentence, failed to take into account the mandatory deadly weapon enhancement. Magnum, in his cross-appeal, argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a verdict finding him guilty of burglary. The trial court found that the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. HardcastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. McCullumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BraykovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. DiamondSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. PeerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. RaybuckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. SolomonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.