Legal Opinion
Trever v. City of Sterling Heights
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 1974No. Docket 16999PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P. J.
Plaintiff Joseph Trever owns a 24-acre parcel of land in Sterling Heights. He wanted to build a shopping center on his property but discovered it was zoned single family residential (hereinafter referred to as SFR). In 1967, Trever received oral assurances from Sterling Township 1 officials that his land would be rezoned planned business. Thereafter, on October 31, 1967, plaintiff leased a portion of the property to Mobil Oil Corporation for 15 years for a gasoline service station. In November, 1967, Trever formally petitioned the township board to rezone his land planned business. On May 21,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Lansing v. DawleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Moreland v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Bassey v. City of Huntington WoodsMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Drummer Development Corp. v. Township of AvonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nasierowski Brothers Investment Company v. City of Sterling HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Seguin v. City Of Sterling HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Eason v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF BOULDERColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Land Development Corp. v. Township of BloomfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Sequin v. City of Sterling HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.