Legal Opinion

Bassey v. City of Huntington Woods

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1956No. Docket 59, Calendar 46,582PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

It is asserted in this case that the zoning ordinance (No 130) of the city of Huntington Woods is, as to plaintiffs’ property, unreasonable, discriminatory and unconstitutional. The trial judge so held. The defendants have taken a general appeal.

The properties here involved (with one exception) are lots fronting on Woodward avenue in the Huntington Woods subdivision, city of Huntington Woods, Michigan. The remaining lot, lot 87, is'located on the south side of Eleven Mile road west of Woodward avenue. The Woodward lots are zoned for single-family use. Lot 87 is zoned for 2-family, residential…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Long v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hammond v. Bloomfield Hills Building InspectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Cleveland v. NewsomMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Oschin v. Township of RedfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Ed Zaagman, Inc. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Business Ventures, Inc. v. Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. Reibel v. City of BirminghamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Bzovi v. City of LivoniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API