Legal Opinion
Nasierowski Brothers Investment Company v. City of Sterling Heights
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 22, 1991No. 90-1437PublishedCited by 134 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, the Nasierowski Brothers Investment Company (Nasierow-ski), appealed the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, the City of Sterling Heights, Michigan (the City), et al.,1 in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In an order entered March 5, 1990, the district court ruled that Nasierowski’s cause of action was not ripe for adjudication, and further held that Na-sierowski had failed to state a cognizable constitutional claim.
This controversy stems from Nasierow-ski’s purchase in April, 1986 of an undeveloped parcel…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Bowlby v. City of Aberdeen, Miss.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Heyne v. Metropolitan Nashville Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Charles W. Warren Ruth Warren v. City of Athens, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Norbert C. Pearson, Also Known as Spike v. City of Grand Blanc, J. Larry TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.