Legal Opinion

Sequin v. City of Sterling Heights

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1992No. 91-1268PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, Raymond and Barbara Seguin, Albert A. Oliveto and Milton Shiftman, appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant, City of Sterling Heights, in this action alleging that defendants’ zoning practices deprived plaintiffs of their rights to due process, equal protection and just compensation as guaranteed by the fifth and fourteenth amendments.

I

The plaintiffs, Raymond and Barbara Se-guin, Albert A. Oliveto and Milton M. Shift-man, are owners of three adjoining separate parcels of real estate in Sterling Heights, Michigan.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seguin v. City Of Sterling HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. Baranowski v. Borough of PalmyraDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API