Sequin v. City of Sterling Heights
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, Raymond and Barbara Seguin, Albert A. Oliveto and Milton Shiftman, appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant, City of Sterling Heights, in this action alleging that defendants’ zoning practices deprived plaintiffs of their rights to due process, equal protection and just compensation as guaranteed by the fifth and fourteenth amendments.
I
The plaintiffs, Raymond and Barbara Se-guin, Albert A. Oliveto and Milton M. Shift-man, are owners of three adjoining separate parcels of real estate in Sterling Heights, Michigan.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Seguin v. City Of Sterling HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Baranowski v. Borough of PalmyraDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994