Legal Opinion

Mattone v. Argentina

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1931No. 22414PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The sole question for determination in this controversy is whether or not the common pleas judge in any county in this state, in a transitory tort action, has jurisdiction to hear and determine such controversy where both the plaintiff and the defendant are nonresidents of Ohio, the cause of action having arisen outside the state of Ohio, and it not appearing that there is property of or debts owing to the defendant in any county in Ohio, but where proper and lawful service of summons is made upon the defendant in a county of the state, in accordance with Section 11276, General Code.

A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. BaillieOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Boright v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Herrmann v. Franlkin Ice Cream Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Kearns v. SherrillOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Hughes v. ScaffideOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Edelstein v. KidwellOhio Supreme Court · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API