Chambers v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The sole issue raised upon appeal is whether the trial court erred in dismissing these actions utilizing the common-law doctrine of forum non conveniens. Because we view the cautious application of this doctrine, which allows a court having proper jurisdiction to dismiss an action when to do so would further the ends of justice and promote the convenience of the parties, as an inherent power of the trial court, resting within its sound discretion, and because we find the lower court did not abuse its discretion herein, we affirm the dismissals below.
I
The doctrine of forum non conveniens has,…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- U.S. Sprint Communications Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Mr. K's Foods, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Fox v. Bd. of Sup'rs of La. State Univ.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Marchman v. NCNB Texas National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- National City Commercial Capital Corp. v. AAAA At Your Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
- Information Leasing Corp. v. JaskotOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.