Legal Opinion

Edelstein v. Kidwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1942No. 28847PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Conceding that the court was justified by the state of the record in granting a new trial to plaintiff because of the inadequacy of the verdict, could the court grant a new trial without vacating the entire verdict of the jury?

There are many cases in common-law jurisdictions which hold that it is within the power of the trial court, where there is more than one issue of fact in the case and such issues are distinct and separable in their nature, to order a new trial of one issue and refuse it as to the others. 27 Am. & Eng. Ann. Cas., 365; 46 Corpus Juris, 74, Section 24; Zaleski v. Clark, 46…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Yazoo & M. V. R. v. ScottMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Mattone v. ArgentinaOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. The Wheeling Lake Erie Ry. Co. v. RichterOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Cullen v. SchmitOhio Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Markota v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Mast v. Doctor's Hospital NorthOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Miller v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Hanna v. WagnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Mast v. Doctor's Hospital NorthOhio Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API