Legal Opinion

State v. Nakoa

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1991No. 14808PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MOON, J.

Defendant-appellant Randall Ku Nakoa (Nakoa) appeals from his conviction of escape in the second degree, a violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 710-1021(1). Nakoa contends that: 1) the evidence presented at trial failed to establish that he was in custody when he fled from the police; 2) the trial court erred when it gave certain jury instructions which invited jury confusion; and 3) he was denied his right to a fair trial because the prosecutor stated her personal opinion as to the credibility of the two police officers who testified against him. Upon…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. PineroHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. MarshHawaii Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. RamseySupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. State v. VillezaHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. VaitogiHawaii Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Medford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. State v. HolbronHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. PachecoHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. AlstonHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. KetchumHawaii Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API