Legal Opinion

State v. Ketchum

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2001No. 23745PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

LEVINSON, J.

The plaintiff-appellant State of Hawaii [hereinafter, the “prosecution”] appeals from the findings of fact (FOFs), conclusions of law (COLs), and order of the first circuit court, the Honorable Russell Blair presiding, granting the defendant-appellee Burt T. Ket-chum’s motion to suppress. On appeal, the prosecution asserts that the circuit court erred in suppressing Ketchum’s responses, on three separate occasions, to Honolulu Police Department (HPD) officers’ questions regarding his residential address; in each instance, he indicated that his address was…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. State v. JessHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. KaleohanoHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. EliHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. McKnight.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API