State v. Marsh
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LUM, C.J.
This is an appeal from a robbery conviction. During closing remarks, the prosecutor expressed her personal opinion concerning Defendant’s guilt and the credibility of the defense witnesses. We hold that the prosecutor’s remarks constituted misconduct which deprived Defendant of a fair trial, and reverse.
I
A jury convicted Marsh of robbery in the second degree in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 708-841(1 )(a). The State’s case rested primarily on the testimony of the victim, Leroy Ing. Marsh denied committing the robbery and asserted an alibi…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Viereck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. David GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- State v. KahalewaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. RoganHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HolbronHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. EnglandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. ClarkHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. GanalHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.