Ex parte Williams
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Petitioner was convicted in the justice’s court of Mariposa county of a misdemeanor arising under section 537 of the Penal Code; he was fined, with the alternative of imprisonment, and failing to pay the fine went to jail. He now seeks Ms release on Imbeas corpus, assigning (1) that the complaint charged no offense under the statute, and (2) that the ■statute is unconstitutional.
1. As to the last point, the validity of the section was sustained in Ex parte Ruffin, 119 Cal. 487, and we do not regard the further objections now urged by petitioner as seriously challenging the constitutionality…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- In re PrimeNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Ex parte WhitakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1869
- Ex parte RuffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Matter of Application of La DueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- In re AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re KasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- In Re SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.