People v. Mahony
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, E. B. Power, Deputy Attorney-General, and Lewis F. Byington, District Attorney, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal by the people from a judgment in favor of defendant, sustaining and allowing his demurrer to an indictment found and presented against him by the grand jury of the city and county of San Francisco, the grounds of demurrer specified, in addition to want of facts to constitute a public offense, being that the indictment did not substantially conform to the requirements of sections 950, 951, and 952 of the Penal Code.
The superior court, apparently being of the opinion that the objection on which the demurrer was allowed might be avoided in a new indictment, directed that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- People v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Mandeville v. SolomonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- People v. CarolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- People v. SteelikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. ScofieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- State v. HaleMontana Supreme Court · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.