Legal Opinion
Dinkins v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 10, 1977No. 7303PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from a conviction under D.C.Code 1973, § 22-2701, for what popularly but inaccurately has been called soliciting for prostitution. The case was originally submitted without oral argument to a division consisting of Judges Fickling, Mack and Pair (retired). In the usual course, and according to our intracourt practice, a proposed opinion of the court, authored by Judge Fickling, was circulated to the nondivision judges. Judge Pair circulated . a dissent. The division majority proposed to reverse for lack of evidence on a rationale to be discussed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Curran v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Bayouth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Fitzhugh v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rose v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.