Legal Opinion
Bayouth v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 29, 1956No. A-12238PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POWELL, Judge.
Jack Bayouth, plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged by amended information filed in the court ■of common pleas of Tulsa County with the violation of 21 O.S.A. § 1029, in that, in the words of the information:
“On the 2nd day of December, A.D. 1954, * * * in Tulsa, County, Jack Bayouth * * * did unlawfully, wilfully, wrongfully and knowingly entice Irene Hamilton to commit an act of lewdness with him in the following manner, to-wit:‘ by calling the said Irene Hamilton on the phone and asking her to have sexual intercourse with him and did promise…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Toms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Ex Rel Eubanks v. Cole, District JudgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Atchley v. Board of Barber Examiners of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Hurst v. PitmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dinkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Eisner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Rogers v. J. R. Oil & Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- State v. FraleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.