Chrysler Corp. v. Quimby
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Southerland, C. J.:
This is a suit for damages for breach of contract founded on promissory estoppel. The plaintiff is Charles H. Quimby, *268individually and as assignee of Randall Motors, Inc. The defendant is Chrysler Corporation. The case was tried before a jury, which gave Quimby a verdict for $92,200.34. Defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in its favor or for a new trial was denied. Chrysler appeals. „
In the following statement of facts we shall assume, as we must, that the jury believed Quimby’s account of the facts and accepted the inferences from all the testimony most favorable to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Goodman v. DickerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- J. R. Watkins Co. v. RichMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Parizo v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- In Re Santa Fe Pacific Corp. Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Lord v. SouderSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- US Ecology, Inc. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Furek v. University of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.