J. R. Watkins Co. v. Rich
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
The action is against Rich as principal and the other defendants as his sureties. Judgment ran against Rich, but in favor of the sureties, and plaintiff reviews. Trial was had before the court without a jury. No exceptions to the findings were seasonably filed, and the judgment stands if sustained by the findings. Gervickes v. Royal Exchange Assurance Co., 222 Mich. 103.
Plaintiff sells merchandise through salesmen who buy it on credit and solicit business and deliver goods in allotted territory. Eich had contracts with plaintiff continuously since 1924, and had become indebted to it in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cummer v. ButtsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Bishop v. Bloomington Canning Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
- Holton v. Monarch Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Warner v. Fallon Coal Mines Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Brucker v. Manistee & Grand Rapids RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Cloverdale Equipment Company v. Simon Aerials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- United Roasters, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Gambar Enterprises, Inc. v. Kelly Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Bushwick-Decatur Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Randolph v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.