Legal Opinion

Cleveland v. Wong

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 21, 1985No. 56,450PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.:

This is an appeal in a medical malpractice action. The defendant, Dr. David Wong, a urologist, appeals from a judgment entered against him and in favor of his former patient, Lynn Eugene Cleveland, the plaintiff, after a jury trial in Sedgwick County. The issues urged on appeal include whether the plaintiffs claims were barred by the statute of limitations; whether the jury verdict was invalid for the reason that ten jurors did not agree on the specific act of negligence; whether the issues were properly submitted and the jury properly…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Hecht v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. State v. ArneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. State v. Rider, Edens & LemonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Wolfgang v. Mid-America Motorsports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. State v. RuebkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. Tetuan v. A.H. Robins Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  4. Humes v. ClintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. Delaney v. CadeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API