Legal Opinion
Tetuan v. A.H. Robins Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided June 12, 1987No. 58,502PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Allegrucci, J.:
Plaintiff Loretta L. Tetuan filed the present civil action against defendant A.H. Robins Co., Inc., on January 29, 1982. The plaintiffs suit concerned personal injuries allegedly resulting from her use of an intrauterine contraceptive device known as the “Daikon Shield,” and alleged negligence, civil conspiracy, strict liability in tort, breach of warranty of merchantability, breach of express warranty, fraud, and gross and wanton negligence. On May 3, 1985, a jury returned a verdict in the plaintiff s favor for $1.7 million in…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- In Re Northern District of California, Dalkon Shield Iud Products Liability Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MaloneTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Diana L. Mason, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Otis W. Mason, Deceased v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Xiangyuan (Sue) Zhu v. Countrywide Realty, Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Leiker Ex Rel. Leiker v. GaffordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.