Roseland v. Wentzell

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

Appellants challenge summary judgment for respondents on appellants’ claims of legal malpractice and statutory violations under Minn.Stat. §§ 325N.01-.18 (2014), Minnesota’s home-ownership and equity-protection act (MHOEPA), and on respondent’s counterclaim for foreclosure of an equitable mortgage.1 Appellants also challenge the amount of the judgment against them. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

Appellants Kenneth and Diana Roseland own farmland identified as parcels A through E in Pine County and parcels F and G in Carlton…