Legal Opinion
State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 30, 2016No. A15-1432PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LILLEHAUG, Justice.
Following a search of his vehicle during a traffic stop, appellant Jose Martin Lugo, Jr., was charged with second-degree controlled substance crime, driving after revocation, and possession of drug paraphernalia. Lugo moved to suppress the evidence obtained during the search, arguing that police illegally expanded the scope and duration of the stop without a reasonable, articulable suspicion. The district court granted Lugo’s motion to suppress and dismissed both drug-related charges.
The State appealed to the court of appeals. In an unpublished opinion, the court…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Leona Rose deLottinvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. OsorioSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. MikeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.