Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 2017No. A15-0708PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

The question presented in' this case is whether a district court may allow the State to reopen its case-in-chief before ruling on the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal made at the close of the State’s case. After the State rested, appellant Quintín Lynn Thomas made a motion for judgment of acquittal, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of the charged offense. In response, the State asked to reopen its case-in-chief. The district court granted the State’s request before considering Thomas’ motion for judgment of acquittal. After…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. People v. WhippleNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ries v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James FirkusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
  3. State of Minnesota v. Scot Perry ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
  4. State of Minnesota v. Steven Andrew RyanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API