Legal Opinion
State v. Osorio
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 22, 2017No. A15-0921PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
We are presented here with a 21-month delay between the date appellant David Osorio was charged with a crime and his *624eventual arrest and are asked to decide whether that delay violated his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. The Hennepin County Attorney’s office charged Osorio in May 2013 with two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. The district court mailed the complaint and summons to Osorio’s last known address in Perris, California. The summons directed Osorio to make his first appearance in Hennepin' County district court in June 2013. When…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Vermont v. BrillonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crow v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- State v. StrobelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- State of Minnesota v. Anthony Lee PrellwitzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State v. GaylesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. PriggeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017