Legal Opinion

State v. Setzer

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 1983No. 8227SC700PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The defendant argues under one assignment of error that the indictment on which he was tried is fatally defective. The indictment reads as follows:

“The Jurors For The State Upon Their Oath Present that on or about the 17th day of October, 1981, in Cleveland County Cyril Rodney Setzer unlawfully, wilfully, and feloniously having in his possession and with the use and threatened use of firearms, and other dangerous weapons, implements, and means, to wit: a pistol whereby the life of Sheila Chapman was endangered and threatened, did then and there unlawfully, wilfully, forcibly,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. RankinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. AbdullahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. ReebSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. LoftonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. YarboroughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API