Kadrmas v. Sauvageau
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TEIGEN, Judge.
The issue in this appeal is whether a mineral exception and reservation contained in the granting clause of a warranty deed effectively excepted and reserved in the grantors a one-half mineral interest.
On March 13, 1962, Emil P. Sauvageau and Kathleen M. Sauvageau, husband and wife, conveyed by warranty deed to Frank Kadrmas and Betty Jane Kadrmas the Southeast Quarter of Section 11, Township 139, Range 99, and other lands. In the granting clause of the warranty deed and immediately following the description of the land is contained the following exception and reservation:
“except…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
- Benge v. ScharbauerTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Aure v. MacKoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Brown v. KirkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- Body v. McDonaldWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- O'BRIEN v. Village Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Schulz v. HauckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Nichols v. GoughnourNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Acoma Oil Corp. v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Arndt v. MakiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.