Legal Opinion

Arndt v. Maki

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2012No. 20110191PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Angeline Maki and other relatives of Richard Arndt (collectively “Maki defendants”) appeal from a judgment declaring that Arndt and others (collectively “Arndt plaintiffs”) are the owners of mineral interests underlying the Arndt family farm, and the Arndt plaintiffs cross-appeal from the part of the judgment denying their claim against the Maki defendants for attorney fees and costs for slandering title to the minerals. We conclude the district court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the Maki defendants’ counterclaim for reformation of a 1973 contract for…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. JordheimNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Ell v. EllNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Johnson v. HovlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Johnson v. HovlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. WollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. TresenriterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Thimjon Farms Partnership v. First International Bank & TrustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Wenco v. EOG Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Schmitt v. MeritCare Health SystemNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API