Legal Opinion

Schulz v. Hauck

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1981No. Civ. 9982PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Carl W. Schnaidt and Anna Schnaidt appealed from a judgment of the district court, Dunn County, which determined their mineral interest in a parcel of land. We affirm.

The Schnaidts purchased 480 acres of land and contend that they received one-half of the mineral interest in the entire 480 acres. It is uncontested that the State of North Dakota owns the other one-half interest. The estate of a prior grantor, Frank Schulz, claimed that it owned a one- fourth interest in the entire 480 acres, or 120 mineral acres, and brought an action to quiet title. The trial court ruled…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kadrmas v. SauvageauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Atlas Ready-Mix of Minot, Inc. v. White Properties, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Northwestern Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Thomas C. Roel Associates, Inc. v. HenriksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Schwarting v. SchwartingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Bismarck Realty Co. v. FoldenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Miller v. SchwartzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Sorlie v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Walle Mutual Insurance Co. v. SweeneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Johnson v. Mineral Estate, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API