Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Goughnour

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2012No. 20110336PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*742SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] The successors to the interests of eight siblings of John Q. Nichols (“Goughnour defendants”) appeal from a summary judgment in a quiet title action by the successors to the interests of John Q. Nichols (“Nichols plaintiffs”) to determine ownership of 1/2 of the mineral interests in a parcel of land in Mountrail County. The Goughnour defendants claim they collectively own 1/4 of the mineral interests in the land and the Nichols plaintiffs own 1/4 of the mineral interests. The district court decided the Goughnour defendants collectively own 1/9 of the mineral interests…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State Ex Rel. Sathre v. MoodieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Trinity Hospitals v. MattsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. First National Bank v. FlathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Langer v. PenderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. A.G. Golden v. SM Energy CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Hallin v. Inland Oil & Gas CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Blasi v. Bruin E&P PartnersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Johnson v. FinkleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Rolla v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API