Legal Opinion

Aure v. MacKoff

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1958No. 7792PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

This is an action to determine adverse claims to the South one-half of Section 19, Township 151, Range 95, McKenzie County, North Dakota. On June 19, 1929, Matías Aure was the owner in fee simple of this land. On that date he executed and delivered to the State of North Dakota a real estate mortgage covering the land to secure the payment of $2,400. He was then a single man and later married the plaintiff, Mattie Aure. On December 2, 1937, the Aures, as husband and wife, executed an assignment of royalty to W. R. Olson as assignee purporting to:

“sell, assign, transfer, convey…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bilby v. WireNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Sandwich Mfg. Co. v. ZellmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Mickles v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Gregory v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885
  5. Federal Land Bank v. Bank of LenoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. James A. Murray, Justin L. Murray and Joan M. Murray v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Kadrmas v. SauvageauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Pruitt v. Gramatan Investors Corp. (In Re Pruitt)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1987
  4. GeoStar Corp. v. Parkway Petroleum, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Stephenson v. StephensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API