Legal Opinion
Chelrob, Inc. v. Barrett
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 1945PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtC. A. Johnson, J.
This is an application by attorneys and accountants for additional compensation for services in a stockholder’s derivative action.
The several plaintiffs, suing as stockholders of Queens Borough Gas & Electric Company, originally sought to recover on several counts against the officers .and directors of that corporation and against Nassau & Suffolk Lighting Company, Long Island Lighting Company, and the officers and directors of those corporations upon various allegations of wrongful conduct. After a long and arduous trial before Mr. Justice McGarey (sub nom. Espach v. Nassau & Suffolk…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chelrob, Inc. v. BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Sprague v. Ticonic Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Reese v. Pinelawn CemeteryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Chelrob, Inc. v. BarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Espach v. Nassau & Suffolk Lighting Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chelrob, Inc. v. BarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946