Legal Opinion

Chelrob, Inc. v. Barrett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 25, 1946Published

1Opinion of the Court

In a stockholders’ derivative action, plaintiffs obtained a judgment which included an allowance for their attorneys and also their accountants {sub nom. Espach v. Nassau & Suffolk Lighting Co., 177 Mise. 521). The judgment was reversed and the complaint dismissed by this court (265 App. Div. 455). Thereafter the Court of Appeals reinstated the judgment and remitted the matter to this court for the purpose of determining the correctness of the Special Term’s calculations in the estimate of its cost figures (293 N. Y. 442). By stipulation of the parties, the figures of the Special Term were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chelrob, Inc. v. BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Chelrob, Inc. v. BarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  3. Chelrob, Inc. v. BarrettNew York Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API