Chelrob, Inc. v. Barrett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The trial court found that the directors were not guilty of fraud, bad faith or overreaching in negotiating the contracts here attacked. It properly refused to find that they were guilty of negligence in connection therewith. Assuming, without deciding, that the corporate defendants properly may have thrust upon them a fiduciary role, the record discloses that they established that the contracts which they made were fair and just. This conclusion is unavoidable where the evidence *457sustains thé finding that the individuals through whom the corporate defendants acted discharged their functions…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Holmes v. Saint Joseph Lead Co.New York Supreme Court · 1914
- Winter v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Liebman v. Auto Strop Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
3Cited by6 opinions
- Turner v. American Metal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- In re Long Island Lighting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1950
- Chelrob, Inc. v. BarrettNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Chelrob, Inc. v. BarrettNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- Weis v. CoeNew York Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.