Legal Opinion

Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Wickham

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1980No. 79-237PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

In Burger Brewing Co. v. Liquor Control Comm. (1973), 34 Ohio St. 2d 93, this court held that preenforcement review of an agency rule under now repealed R. C. 119.11 was precluded, but that the validity of the rule could properly be adjudicated by a court, in the exercise of its sound discretion, under the Declaratory Judgment Act if a justiciable controversy existed between adverse parties and speedy relief was necessary to the preservation of rights which might otherwise be impaired or lost.2

*19After remand to the appellate court in Burger, the declaratory judgment issued was subsequently…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Fortner v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Burger Brewing Co. v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. American Life & Accident Ins. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Blair v. McDonaghOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. FryeOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Time Warner AxS v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Midwestern College of Massotherapy v. Ohio Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Cowans v. Ohio State Racing Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API